为什么一个马来西亚会有东西之别呢？

为什么一个马来西亚会有东西之别呢？

因为东马人尤其是沙巴人生性温驯，鲜少对事情有激烈的争取，因此，于人误认为沙巴人很满意政府的一切所作所为。

因为发展有悬殊，有施政上的偏心，所以才会出现东西马有别矣。

今天东马人还要付西马人都不必付的所谓运输费就能买到理想的汽车了 。东西马怎么会不有分别呢？

以前（60，70年代）的’东西马有别‘是东马（沙巴人）比西马人较富有，可是今天产油的东马人皆比不产油的西马穷，何解？

因为60，70年代的东马盛产木材，木材税是100巴仙归东马的州政府（沙巴）；反观今日的石油税，州政府却只能收到区区的5巴仙。

如果联邦合理公平的发配发展金，这个’东西马有别‘根本就不会出现。

有关华总认同沙巴州政府和人民要求联邦检讨提高石油开采税的可行性

联邦政府会认同吗？有可能吗？

正当联邦政府四处找钱的时候，这项要求似乎是天方夜谭吧？

如果联邦和州的关系良好，也许这样的要求或许是大有可能的事，但是作为联邦政府，钱交来联邦先，好过直接叫到州政府手上吧？不然给人错误印象，以为联邦的势力给削弱了。

如果这项要求是在308刚发生的头六个月内提出的话，或许成功的机会会很高。现在嘛，则要看州政府是否是团结一致的一群了。如果沙巴国阵是名副其实的团结，那么这项要求也许会有结果的。再说，沙巴国阵的主导权是在沙巴巫统的手上矣。

问题是有谁敢去碰这个‘蜂窝’呢？

所以杨德利的进步党还是有其利用的价值的。

How I wish PM was warded in Queen Elizabeth Hospital?

How I wish PM was warded in Queen Elizabeth Hospital so that he'd have personal experience in understanding our dilapidated condition better?

By providing up to standard medical cares to the society at a competitive cost is one of the top priorities of the government. But, how long can the government sustain the huge costs involved every year with the present rate of fees at a meager RM1 & RM5 per visit respectively?

We pay less and we should expect to get less, it's the rule, therefore, it's important that we must have a clean and efficient government in the first place that fund allocated are fully used in the services.

People must also start to pay more at public hospitals or clinics in order to relieve the government burden but at the same time government must also help people to earn more to reduce the government's subsidies on various welfares rendered to the public.

The real answer still lies with money or fund, that is how good the government in handling the economy.

How I feel about high income economy?

HIGH INCOME ECONOMY
by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
Putrajaya, Malaysia
Prime Minister of Malaysia
1981 - 2003 http://chedet.co.cc/chedetblog/2010/10/high-income-economy-1.html

The above link from former PM Tun Mahathir is referred.

Surely the government has the answer on how much would be enough for each individual in order to pay for all their necessary living costs, and therefore should be able to come out with the minimum income figure so that every employers must pay at least the minimum amount say for a clerk as example.

The authority should also have  figures for other categories of workers in the country, some sorts of guidebook or guideline for remuneration.

The government should therefore act now with the minimum income policy instead of seeing workers staging strike or demonstration.

 

How long can the government or the country afford on the human resource drains?

The success of the high income policy lies with its implementation which is most crucial in its entire cycle.

There seems even more serious problems ahead than just losing our people to other countries; it is the unemployable human resources that we really should be worrying now, and the education department must really be fully revamped quickly.

I hope we will not end up with high salary but zero purchasing power just because of our human resources are 'molded' to be of low quality and productivity.