Why shouldn't UEC be recognized by the government of 1Malaysia?

How much longer the confrontation between the Chinese descendants and the authority predominantly Malay-led will have to continue on this issue?

I thought that the launch of 1Malaysia campaign would have washed out all the negative feelings in our nation's unity building, and the recognition of UEC is indeed one of the people's wishes to be urgently fulfilled by the PM Najib.

I hope 1Malaysia is not truly an empty slogan.

More diversity of education is good for any country including Malaysia, why on earth the authority put up obstacles to block it? It's not going to cause any harm to the existing and on-going education's policy, aims, and aspirations of the country; then why is it not agreeable to the authority?

The world will no doubt still spin without Chinese education, but it will only becoming a national handicap when dealing with the Chinese in Malaysia or abroad.

If the graduates from these Chinese independent schools have already met the government's education standards, then why are they not recognised by the government while our neighbour, Singapore grabs them without hesitation, why?

I hate to say it's because of racism.

副相纳吉就华人寄居论代人道谦

其实代人道谦有跡可寻,想当年翁诗杰"三萬变三千"事件"開罪"希沙母丁还不是他的前上司馬士打花替他摆平道谦打圆場了事,虽然整个事件错不在翁,奈何身为"小人"不得不"小人該死,冒犯大人"匆匆枉作小人收場.
因为事情处理有欠公平,人民尤其是華社因此都高举老翁為敢於揭发弊端而名声大噪也.
为何翁当時不向希沙道谦呢?因为翁認為他揭人好事,错不在他;更且,他是替人民做正事尽其作为人民代议士的责任而已.
希沙母丁也因此事件自暴其丑丢尽颜面.
据说与此同时,在内阁的馬華同僚部長們涉嫌在内阁会议時未曾揭力维護老翁,导致老翁成众矢之的,一時狼狈不堪,难於招架.
今次副首相替同志道谦实有姑息养奸误导群众之嫌,至於其行动的真正代表性及有效性,有待今後巫統各阶层的言谈,行為举止才能下定論了.