Teachers cum Politicians?

I read with disbelief of what is reported in The New Strait Times today that teachers are to be allowed to take part in politic. (http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Monday/National/2518471/Article/index_html)

The idea was introduced during a speech in the recent UMNO General Assembly by Datuk Seri Hishammuddin, the Education Minister and newly elected UMNO Vice President.National Union of the Teaching Profession secretary-general, Ms. Lok Yim Pheng follows suit by saying "It is a good idea to allow Group A teachers to take part in politics. These are people with lots of ideas."

She said, however, those in administrative positions should not be involved in politics
“experienced teachers could further help develop the country if they are allowed to participate in politics”.

The government should not accept this proposition as the idea, if implemented, is going against the basic principle of “The Three Pillars of Governance - Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary.”

The result of mixing politic and education is, in one word, “Mess.” They should also know that their advantage of being impartial is long lost as a result of joining the politic.

The teachers are civil servants, and should belong to the Executive arm of the government system. There will be conflict of interest in involving teachers in politic, besides, will they be allowed to join opposition parties?

If teachers are allowed the privilege, what about other civil servants like Police, Military personnel etc.?

Their involvement in politic, if given, will not only violate the regulations and rules, but also depriving our children to proper education due to distraction from the main task accordingly.

I’d suggest that, if they think they have the acumen, they should only consider joining active politic after they’ve left the service. You can’t have both at the same time as it’s obviously conflicting with each other.

The Education Minister should instead making sure that the current education system be completely revamped where these teachers’s “expertise” are really needed. He’d do us parents a big favour if he could care to go down to the field and see for himself the “mess” that these educationists been doing to the children, parents, family, and the society at large. Schooling is no more fun, it’s simply “torture”. Parents have been complaining for years but fallen on deaf ears. If you asked the parents, 9 out of 10 are the silent complainants on the education topic.

If history can be manipulated, twisted by dishonest historians, then it’s not a matter of having history class or subject introduced in the primary school, but simply is a matter of getting the fact right and getting people to be righteous. They (UMNO) shouldn’t worry that the children do not know the history as most voters are mostly ignorant in history too.

Sabah People Expects UMNO Sabah To Deliver

Does the success of Sabah UMNO in the recent UMNO assembly bring new changes to Sabah?

It now lies with the capability and competency of the UMNO State Liaison office and its leaders, to deliver the wishes of Sabahan.

People expects performance, now that they are given responsible positions in the top leadership, they must be able to deliver what has expected of them.

The day of lame excuses for not able to deliver is over.

They should be united in their efforts to bring benefits to the people of Sabah. They should work closely with the existing BN components in Sabah, be they local or semenanjung-based. They are now the real bridge between Sabah & Semenanjung.

Being locals, they should know all the Sabahan's issues accordingly.

This is also the time that federal shows their sincerity in helping the Sabah people.

Will the dreadful situation of Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) be resolved quickly with the emergence of Sabah UMNO in the backbone of BN government?

Will the widely concerns of illegal immigrant issues be satisfactorily resolved now with greater political influence in the central government network?

Will the other pressing issues expediently solved before next general election?

Their shoulders become heavy with the new achievements in the UMNO assembly.

We can only hope that they'd be able to accomplish them all, otherwise, BN in Sabah would become irrelevant in the next election.

From UMNO To MCA Sabah

I'm intrigued by the remarks of YB Bung Moktar, the Kinabatangan member of Parliament, on the great performance of Sabah UMNO in the just concluded UMNO General Assembly.

"He said that while Sabah's performance in the 12th general election was important, equally crucial was the delegates' preference in wanting to see a balanced representation among the states."

The honourable YB Bung Moktar also said: "that all states were represented in the line-up and this would go a long way in restoring confidence in the party".

However, he had not mentioned that the UMNO Central Delegates from Sabah is the second highest in terms of numbers!

I'm referring to a news reported in Bernama 27-March-2009 where the outspoken YB from the east coast of Sabah, made the comment after their glorious success in Putra World Trade Centre. (http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=399649).

The achievements of Sabah UMNO are as follows:-

Datuk Shafie Apdal as Vice President, Datuk Rosnah as Putri UMNO Head, Datuk Musa Aman, Datuk Lajim Okin, and Datuk Bong Moktar as Central Committee Members.

Indeed, this is a healthy political development and trend for Sabah and Malaysia; I hope that the trend would be extended to other federal-based parties like MCA, MIC and Gerakan, not only for party influence regionally, but for the sake of national integration.

MCA in its last AGM had elected two (2) Central Committee Members from Sabah, which "rightfully" should have been three (3). It was. however, considered a "break through" for Sabah MCA, as the state had always been "given" only one seat (after some consensus understanding).

It has also been the majority wish of Sabah MCA to see greater, and significant, participation in the central leadership; the creation of a Vice President post solely for East Malaysian region will be a favourable, if not remarkable, reformation. The logic for the reformation is that a closer ties, and involvement, with the East Malaysian states, is the positive way to bring down all the barriers between the people of east and west Malaysia.

I feel that the current representation is just not enough and warrants a serious review by the top leaders if MCA sincerely wants to have influence in the politic of Sabah or Sarawak.

The MCA Central Delegates from Sabah, which stands at 125 at the moment, can be doubled, if more aggressive efforts from central leadership are forthcoming.

The golden opportunity is available now with SAPP being out of the BN, and that the Sabah MCA is the only Chinese Party on par with the strength of UMNO, provided MCA wants to be so. It's now up to the top MCA leaders whether they want the party to fill the vaccum in Sabah. It may be "now or never" for MCA Sabah.

We hope that the same achievement by Sabah UMNO can be "emulated" in the federal civil services that more Sabahan or East Malaysian are accepted like their counterparts in the political arena.

The ball is now with the federal leaders, especially so for the new UMNO leadership.

No More Politicking With The State Hospital

I'm amazed at the level of awareness of our State YB on the actual situation of Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) that our Assistant Rural Development Minister Datuk Sairin Karno, YB for Keningau, said "the Kota Kinabalu hospital (QEH) management should look for a suitable site to build a new hospital, instead of buying yet another private hospital or an old building". YB also said that the Keningau District Hospital is still new and very well equipped for solving hospital-related problems in the city. He is also concerning about the millions of Ringgits that could be required for resolving the crisis.
(Please refer to the following URL for details of news report from Daily Express 22-March-2009, http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=63646)

Honestly, he was only slightly right and mostly "wrong" in his understanding of the situation, it's shocking and disappointing to hear from a people's representative so ignorance of a crucial and important matter albeit of the controversy surrounding it right now; I'd strongly suggest that the State Cabinet or State Assembly convene an emergency briefing to all State & Federal YBs on the pressing matter, considering that the QEH is a State hospital, i.e. it should be the best in the state and among the bests in the country.

It's not really a simple case as perceived by YB Sairin. It's bad enough for him to have "sleepless" nights if he ever been briefed on the situation.

It's already a "nightmare" to send patients between hospitals around Kota Kinabalu, what more if it is between Kota Kinabalu & Keningau, as it's common experience for most travelers of the danger of this route. If it's really not a problem to travel on the Kota Kinabalu-Keningau route as claimed by the honourable YB, then the building of the existing Keningau hospital may sound like a waste of public money; that the people of Keningau could have been using the QEH than having their own.

It certainly not funny for both patient and their relatives to be away from their home by being placed in Keningau hospital. There have been cases of next-of-kin and relatives of patients complaining of the inconveniences and stresses to travel on the relatively easier distance between Beaufort and Kota Kinabalu.

The Honourable YB should get down to the "field" to feel and see the reality before making himself look naive, perhaps he's innocent as he's probably never briefed in the assembly or through the cabinet.

The truth is that the QEH is in critical condition and time is insufficient to build a new one within a tolerable time frame. As time is critically important in the quest of saving life, the immediate availability of the SMC definitely a perfect solution to alleviate the situation.

The idea of acquiring the SMC, the only modern hospital available for sale in the area, may look "shameful" to the federal government or State Government, however, if the decision is adopted, may actually turn out to be the "saviour" of the federal government at the end.

There are wrong perceptions by most of the public, especially and regrettably some politicians either from BN or Pakatan Rakyat, that the QEH solution is either getting this building or that building; in actual fact, all the buildings like the Twin Tower Block, New Kinarut Hospital,SMC, Bukit Padang Mesra Hospital, New Heart Centre, or even the Penampang Hospital are all supposedly to be delivered "yesterday", some even as long as twenty years ago!

In other words, Sabah should be asking for all these facilities delivered now even if it's already late and long over-dued for years.

We need a hospital building like SMC anyway, if pricing is the main concern, then the government should engage a reputable or more than one professional valuers to carry out the task of valuation. It may be a refreshing idea that the oppositions engage their own professional valuers to have a "fair" comparison, instead of throwing doubts about the purchase. Nevertheless, the politicians should know their role and boundary well, and not trying to meddle in everything beyond their competency, and making themselves look funny.

There should have been, and should be, a thorough study of the needs at the existing QEH site where an integrated and complete solution should be appropriately designed, planned and implemented, in smooth and less-disrupted stages.

This time round, based on the past experience, we hope that our YBs are all working sincerely, diligently and dedicating their times by especially following up closely with the progress of our hospitals that are going to last for many years to come.

One Malaysian, One Malaysia?

Monday March 16, 2009

MCA backs Najib’s ‘One Malaysia’ concept

(refer to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/3/16/nation/3487677&sec=nation)

KUALA LUMPUR: The MCA supports Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s “One Malaysia” concept in governing the country where policies made will benefit all Malaysians.

Its vice-president, Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai, said Najib had assured the people that fairness would be dealt out and decisions made by the Government would not favour any one group.

“Malaysia must unite and work together with policies that look after the interests of all races,” Liow told a press conference at Cheras Leisure Mall here yesterday.

==================================================================

I read with great excitement about the "policy" that might be materialized when Najib takes over the helm from Ahmad Badawi Abdullah.

It'll definitely "unbelievable" when we still see open "discriminative attitudes and policies" being practiced by the "government" and the "Management" where both arms of the authority are practicing "double standards" bluntly. The result of the last general election prompted the BN to vow for a "reform" or even "transformation", however, we have yet to see it being made true.

It's said that the main cause of Malaysia's problems is "the division of people by their ethnicity and religion". The feelings of inequality and unfairness are widely felt by the people, especially the "non-bumiputras".

The foremost policy under heavy criticisms is the NEP.

The Lack of Opportunity in the civil services and education are the other sources of discontent by the non-bumiputra group. The dominant group lacks of true sense of respect and "dominant" mentality is also the resentment behind the sources of discomfort among the people.

One can say that the scenario is like happiness of some peoples is built from the miseries of the others. However, no one will admit the "bullying" unfair practice despite 52 years of independence, or 46 years for Sabah & Sarawak.

“One Malaysia” to me means Malaysia has only one "progressive race" - Malaysian; the eventual culture is Malaysian made up of various cultures through natural integration; people still identifiable by their community but thinking 100% Malaysian, and equality for all regardless of descendent and creed. It also means no more "bumiputra" and "non-bumiputra" status.

Can it be a reality, or being just a dream of Najib? Is he sincere in this matter? Can he make it? Can the so-called dominant group accept the changes and sacrifices?

Chinese and Indians had been sacrificing a lot in the last 52 years for the noble effort to bring close the "gap"; isn't it time to just being fair by "righting" it?

Is Malaysia still prefers to be a divisive and weak country, or one strong country like "One Malaysia" as coined by Najib?

Labuan Bridge or Queen Elizabeth Hospital?

I refer to the news appearing in the Star Online this afternoon under the title: "A step closer to Labuan-Sabah bridge" by Mr. RUBEN SARIO, and I have reservation on the possibility of building the Labuan-Sabah bridge in the near future. I just feel that it may never take off.

Full details of the report is as shown in the URL:-
http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/3/5/nation/20090305140818&sec=nation

As the Prime Minister later said, after launching the halal distribution hub at Kiansam, some 20kms from downtown Labuan yesterday, that “Something of this magnitude is not immediately possible but it should be given due attention”.

Although the long-awaited bridge, between mainland Sabah and the Labuan island, will definitely boost up the future prospects of Labuanites, the high costs involved must be justified based on value return and urgency, for example.

The project was estimated at approximately RM550million in 1997 under the The Labuan Development Masterplan; it may be much higher comes 2009. It could well be in the billion mark if it were to go ahead now.

Questions are : Why do we need a bridge for Labuan & Sabah? Isn't the present ferry service good enough for the situation there?

What we really hear most is that the ferry service, being a monopoly, has not been doing its "duty" well despite enjoying very profitable business. In other words, the operator is taking its sweet time by doing little instead of bringing out its bests yet.

The fate of Labuan people are therefore in the hands of the ferry operator who can change the island's future by simply improving services such as increasing the frequency of service with reliability.

Do we still need the bridge now if the ferry operator could do their part well? The answer may be "yes! but not now",if the justification hurdle can not be met.

The RM1b might as well be used in other more pressing areas such as, notably, the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) in Kota Kinabalu.

Our leaders should not have announced something that may be years away without taking into account of the reality. They should look into the real needs now than doing something considering as "impractical" at this moment. At least presently, it may not be the bridge that Labuan people needs most.

What the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi should have been done, pragmatically, was to get the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) and the Finance ministry to immediately release the urgently needed funds for projects or schemes meant to help the people getting over the impact of the financial tsunami, as well as solving the woes of Sabahan over the QEH affair.

UMNO SABAH SHOULD USE THEIR INFLUENCE NOW

Wow! No wonder Najib once said that Sabah is BN's Fixed Deposit. Just read the following news feeds from The Star Online and you should know why.

What a pity they didn't lobby the case (of QEH) early, nevertheless, it's still never too late to do so now:-

Sabah a key state for Umno contenders
By MUGUNTAN VANAR

KOTA KINABALU: The who’s who of Umno made a beeline for Sabah as determined candidates pushed the campaigning momentum into high gear with the party elections only three weeks away.

Sabah is an important pit stop for the candidates because its 325 delegates form the second largest group in the party general assembly, after the 578 delegates from Johor.

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/3/2/nation/3382490&sec=nation


Sabah not getting new hospital yet
By MUGUNTAN VANAR

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah has to wait a little longer for a new general hospital despite the urgency of the matter, as there is no budget for it under the current Ninth Malaysia Plan.

“We have agreed in principle to a new hospital, but we cannot say when it will be implemented,” Deputy Health Minister Datuk Dr Abdul Latiff Ahmad told reporters Monday after launching a pre-school food safety campaign.

He was asked about plans to overcome severe congestion at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital here after its eight-storey tower block was closed due to structural problems. Patients were relocated to other hospitals in the state.

“We are still waiting for the budget from the Finance Ministry and the Economic Planning Unit,” he said.

However, he added, a plot of land for the hospital had been identified.

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/3/2/nation/20090302165412&sec=nation

What! No Money for replacing the Sabah's Oldest Established Hospital with a new hospital structure?

Being 2nd largest of 325 votes also can't do anything to help getting the hospitals Sabahan need badly?

It's really a shame for the country as QEH is a Referral Hospital in Sabah. Despite being the longest established hospital since 1953, it's also the only main government hospital in the whole Kota Kinbalu city.

Kota Kinabalu is a State Capital, a tourist's favourite, which is also the main gateway to Sabah.

It will be bad if health services in Kota Kinabalu are at fault or not up to international standard due to the deteriorating condition caused by the "un-safe for use" declaration of its main tower block in last November.

The quality of service is compromised now as a result of the consequential shifting and dispersion of facilities to other surrounding locations.

It should be an important responsibility of the government to make sure that standard is kept to acceptable level, both domestically or internationally. The situation might affect the tourism business badly if no immediate attempts to address the shortcomings.

Finance Minister, also DPM, Dato Najib, should seriously help us on this matter as Sabahan has been suffering enough with all the misdeeds of the pasts.

Never mind about the so-called Sabah Development Corridor which can be developed in parallel despite a little later but not the people's life and health; he should therefore take a special look into this matter urgently, and approve the required fund accordingly now, before it's too late.

This time, DPM should make sure that the government appoints the best contractor to deliver the new building in less than 2 years time.

Sabahan will definitely appreciate it for his competency and caring.

国陣能摒棄种族政策吗?

在The Star online 读到一则Bernama 新闻报导有關回教党精神领袖聶阿兹反对在申请政府提供穷人扶助金時,有区分土著或非土著.新闻参阅:
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/3/1/nation/20090301173409&sec=nation

他说如此做带有濃厚种族主義气味. 甚至也剥夺其他擁有相似基本权利和身份证的种族在享用政府基本设備方面的权利.

在大选投票時,不管土著与否,不分种族都是公平的一人投一票. 他是呼应民主行动党柔佛州州议会反对党领袖巫程豪的评論即谓我国的土著政策形同当年的南非种族隔离政策.

聶阿兹说政府的扶贫机构不是衹为土著而设.在扶贫这方面我看到的衹有不分种族的穷人,而非有土著或非土著穷人之区分.

他说,不管什麽种族,衹要是穷人都应施予援手.

308后,国陣不是說要改革吗?

有勇气摒棄土著,非土著;或任何区分种族的国家政策吗?

独立自主並由土著当家当权了52年,难到还要继續"牺牲"非土著而继续这项公認为不利国家及民族的政策吗?

如果我国要在鼓吹人权及平等的国際平台上理直气壯的替一些第三世界国家说项的话,摒棄这些落伍及过时的政策是時候了.

大势所趨,国陣的理想和精神要受到考验了.

有人说,国阵会掛羊头卖狗肉的说"願意"但缺诚意;也有人说惟有倒下去的国陣才会痛定思痛的"悔改".

人民现在要什麽?

能带领人民渡过经济難關的政府!

条件就是快樂的人民及政治穩定.

在大環境不樂观的情况下,朝野政党必须抛下成见,为人民的利益而稍为牺牲遷就.

否则,人民生活将会每况愈下,最后导致社会的不穩定;国家就会滅亡.

人民的收入及支出平衡就是最基本的政治目标.

我国当務之際,除了调动公幣疏困外,首要迫切行动該是取消过時的种族政策.

把人民一分为三皆为削弱国家的资源及团结的不利政策.

如果我国要在第一時间擺脱经济困境,請把人民重新歸纳为一吧!

Should Government Subsidise These Electric Scooters?

Fossil fuels are getting scarce and environment becomes deteriorating each days, while economy is dive-nosing; the introduction of the electric scooters are just timely and sensible.

I'm referring to a news report published today in The Star Online that warrants a closer look from any ones who are concerning the whole affairs of a sustainable environment and of course, economy.

I think the government should seriously considering a subsidy for the scooter as this is strategically important for our country's future, especially in the State of Sabah where eco-tourism is the focus of the tourism industry.

In order to have significant achievement, certain policy must change in gradual stages / steps to anticipate the move towards greener society such as reducing/limiting car access to the city centre, higher taxes & road taxes on petrol-based vehicles etc.

The Stimulus package introduced by the government should be playing a role in encouraging people switching to sustainable energy transportation.

The public should consider this move as "Money Wise Spent".


http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/13/nation/3261302&sec=nation

Electric scooters on our roads soon

KUALA LUMPUR: How does one cruise on the road without having to worry about petrol prices? With an electric scooter or bicycle, of course.

Better yet, these machines are completely pollution-free. Platinum Logistics Corp Sdn Bhd managing director Albakri Ali said all it takes is a three-point power plug to charge the lead acid battery of the scooter.
....................

PSD Scholarship Based On Merit And Household Income?

I'm delighted to hear that the proposal led by MCA has the "support" from Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan which is published in The Star Online Friday February 13, 2009:-


Merit, income criteria for PSD scholarship
By ROYCE CHEAH

SERDANG: Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan has agreed that the Public Service Department scholarship should be awarded based only on merit and household income, after discussions with MCA leaders and community heads.

MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat said consensus was reached at a recent meeting and that the idea would be brought to the Cabinet for further discussion.

The other leaders involved in the move were from the Indian and Sabah and Sarawak ethnic communities.


Questions are:-

Is this the trend leading towards a just and fair society in Malaysia?
Is it just something put up ahead of the by-polls to be held soon in Perak and Kedah?
Is it real?

What ever it is, this is a positive act and the right attitude from the government, especially the civil service, that the country now highly depends on.

Apart from the approval from the cabinet, the effectiveness in discharging their (PSD especially) duties determines the success or failure of implementing the "new policy". In view of the economy outlook, they should expedite the delivery system the fastest possible way, and reduce all the unnecessary red tapes.

The PSD must also be impartial or seen impartial in its handling.

No ones should be deprived of the opportunity of further education because of financial reason.

The next thing from the government is on making sure they (the students) are able to find jobs upon their graduation. The government and the society should "exploit" their talents and new skills in full, and not letting the asset turns to waste.
This is a matter of sustainable economy issue which is often ignored and neglected by the administrator.

Let's hope that the proposal is quickly adopted in full by the coming cabinet meeting.

Would banning Karpal from entering Perak improves respect for the Sultan?

My view on the following piece of news published in The Star Online today:-

"Ban Karpal from entering Perak"
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/12/nation/20090212154840&sec=nation

I don't think the above call by PKDK president Datuk Tengku Zainol Rashid Tengku Yahya to ban Karpal from entering the state could change the situation. On the contrary, it may create more unnecessary misunderstandings and negative impressions towards our constitution as well as our maturity in politic.

It may not be appropriate for the istana to issue any statement for the infamous decision made on events happened recently, however,people has the right to express themselves and Karpal, being an outspoken politician, should be given the chance to explain his action later when things are settled down.

It's definitely inappropriate for any party to stir up issues where "harsh" and inappropriate actions can only create more resentments, suspicions and unnecessary speculations.

If Karpal were "wrong", there are constitutions and laws that would put him to the appropriate punishments he deserves. After all, Karpal has been a senior lawyer and as an elected representative for years whom should know the limit.

If the call by PKDK president is materialized, a lot of the citizens may not be allowed to enter the state of Perak, not mentioning the problems on setting up checkpoints at all the major entry points in the state for the purpose.

The ruler is above politic and free from politic; in due respect, no political parties should involve the ruler in any way that could tarnish their image and integrity.

Sabah Needs More Cares From Federal

I read with regrets from the following Bernama News this morning:-

TAWAU, Feb 11 (Bernama) -- Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said students who have no birth certificates can still enrol at secondary schools provided one of the parents are Malaysian citizens.
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsgeneral.php?id=389027

The announcement should at least solved some of the woes of the Sabahan on educational aspect but what about other areas such as when visiting health services, welfare department, and so on.


"Hishammuddin said delay by the National Registration Department (NRD) to issue birth certificates should not be used as an excuse by schools to reject the students."

"The NRD will take some time to issue the birth certificates and this will pose a problem to the students when applying to enrol at schools," he added."

Well, I hope that Syed Hamid, the minister of Home Affairs is listening and really pressing his ministry and the NRD to work faster as the livelihood of these people are at stake because of their "blur" status. Be they granted citizenship or not, the process period must not be delayed unreasonably so as to affect their life.

The undetermined figure of actual citizens (census)in the state would also cause incorrect economic and government services planning.

The performance of the NRD has been poor judging from the impression given by the general public who has to deal with the department on citizenship or status application.

BN government can solve all the problems of the people if and only if the man-in-charge has the caring "heart" or sincerity. Sabahan will definitely appreciate for those who has been helping the state.

強制種族比例聘公僕有感

針对人資部建議強制種族比例聘公僕及山打根中華商會所作出的建议及反应,国陣政府应該从善如流,即刻加以落实,以緊密的監督,確保有誠意的贯徹促使成功.

每每听到有關政府人力招聘部门主任於報章或媒体透露似是而非的理由说"华人子弟对公務员职位不屑一顧,而非政府行政机构不要招收";其实這样的說法根本是子虚乌有.讲出及那麽容易就接受如此的"理由"足見国陣领袖及行政机构同人等嚴重缺乏親身体驗和印證事情的真伪.

如没記錯,马华同志似乎在每年的中央代表大会都有提刭這件心願,奈何"伙伴"每每选擇性不想配合才有今天的窘境.

如果不是徵聘过程不公,调职升迁不平,华人怎么会不加入公務员的行列呢?

国陣政府如能廢除"种族""宗教"等的个人资料,辅以个人的辦事能力來作为聘用,升迁,或赏罰分明就能一劳永逸解决困扰各社群,尤其是华社,的公務员隱憂和困境.

无可否認,华人公務员的比例如能维持30%以上將会提升公務员整体素质,衹要给予机会,肯定会改造政府部门的效率和服務水平.华人传统文化与美德在朔造优秀公務员上居功至偉.各民族应该常在－起做事,互相学习中暸解各方的文化之長与短,国家服務才能有所突破.

好的公務员系统就是等於良好的政府交货系统(Delivery System),整个国家的競爭力及收入也会因应而影响深远.

国陣真的能贯徹全民平等的政策吗?

欲知更多有關山打根中華商會所作出的建议及反应的详请,可参考:-
http://ocdn.founder.net.my/news.php?newsid=36178

違約与民主

沙巴民主行動黨署理主席黃仕平指出，市政廳收回已批准該黨於年初三租用達邁民衆大會堂舉辦農曆新年門戶開放慶典，以及拆掉原本已批准該黨從一月廿日至二月十日(元宵節)在和生園及億達豎立的賀歲廣告牌的做法已違約。請參阅华僑日報(2009-Feb-03):-
http://ocdn.founder.net.my/news.php?newsid=36041

曾獲准租用場地辦新春慶典,及和生園億達豎立的两面賀歲廣告牌都遭倉促腰斬拆除,火箭將因此起訴市政廳違約一事,誰是誰非? 暫時也祗能听行动党的一面之詞.因为据新闻传出后,当記者面询市長有關事件時,却不欲对此事置评,也許内有乾坤,抑或有苦衷?

根据当日(年初三)经过該場地,空无一人,並无政府或任何团体使用,難道市政廳宁可有錢不要赚?

依我看,就算有小字列明说市政廳有权"違約"而取消是项租借,這样不講信用的行动实属不智;除非政府要同時间无可避免徵用该場地,將另当别論,否则就有政治報復或嫉妒小氣之嫌.

亞庇的国会议员來自民主行動黨. 代表国陣政府管理亞庇市的市政廳竟然甘冒不尊敬的大險与大部份的人民对立是成孰的决定吗? 政治常識何在? 值得一问的有趣问题是:是誰下的命令? 是市政廳,地政部,州政府,或联邦政府?

我相信人民会对此种不民主的表现産生负面評价而对国陣不利.当年人民党打压人民而莫名其妙的倒台至今曆曆在目,前車之錾,不可掉以輕心哦!


国陣要收復失地先要有誠意地赢取民心,而公正清廉,是非分明的行动正是民心所願矣! 国陣自重!

Have we been focusing on unity as claimed by Tee Keat?

After reading the following news clip in TheStar Online today:-
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/30/nation/3154003&sec=nation

I wonder if :-
1. The Star's reporter had heard and recorded wrongly, or,
2. Ong TK didn't mean what he said over the topic of party unity.

Every ones in the country knows that MCA has internal problems (between the two top leaders) since the party election on 18th October, 2008.

Even Tan Sri Muhyiddin of Johor UMNO just recently said so in his concern on BN's strength.

It's therefore a complete denial of the truth on the part of Ong TK while Chua Soi Lek openly just said that he had been marginalised and suppressed by the party top officials since elected as Deputy president in last October.

The questions are :-

1.Why do we still have to lie while honesty could be the better way to handle the situation?

2.Why can't we tell the world especially the chinese community about the actual problems, or perhaps simply call for an EGM to re-elect a new leadership immediately instead of the dead- lock which renders the party in limbo?

I honestly can't understand the logic and wisdom behind all these seemingly stupidity "acts" by the top party officials.

One Chinese community leader locally even said to me "Why all these hypocrisies and a waste of time while the country is facing an emergency of financial crisis?" "Does MCA know that the voters have a lot of choices now since march 8, 2008?"

I hope that the leadership can swiftly come out with a positive solution on Unity before it's too late.

沙巴的文化融合

沙巴华人餐厅,食客尽是华人,而跑堂厨房尽是土著同胞.

沙巴华人新年团拜,观众大部份华人大小,而醒師团舞獅头打鼓敲锣者,尽是土著同胞.

不禁要问:沙巴华人子弟何去?!

不需立法,不需经过官方干涉操控,华人子弟"自动"放棄固有的文化堡壘,华人文化的延續以土著的融合來完成,的確是令人驚訝和感嘆.

有時看到一些太过"熱衷"的政治家和政府行政者,尤其是西马,因一些胸襟狹窄,有偏見及氣量小的人士的兴风作浪而把－件本来属於高尚崇高的民间文化交流搞得面目全非,令人感到遗撼.

文化交流必须去宗教,去政治化為上.那些意图把人民"分類"的政策與執行是当今政府應該努力去消除及刻不容缓的国家大事.

Sabah Or Sarawak?

After reading the news put up by Bernama and The Star Online, I start to wonder why they keep making the same mistake on Sabah and Sarawak.

I'm referring to the following piece of news today:-

Title: Body of third Sabah landslide victim found
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/26/nation/20090126110539&sec=nation

It should have been "Sarawak" rather than "Sabah" as Limbang is within the territory of Sarawak and not Sabah.

The editor in Bernama should be more careful in his/her editorial works.

Maybe that's the result of years of ignorence and one of the indications of Sabah being left-out in the nation building?

以地养"校"?

沙巴独中董总与沙巴國民型華校董联会呼吁州政府制定” 以地养校”政策,让州内華校取得固定收入充作学校发展. 以后也不需每年到处募捐籌欸，沙巴馬華对此建议壮举将全力支持并会以各种方式协助促进其成.

政府拨出土地或特别准证予華校已非新鲜”壮举”,始自人民党時代辗转至今,最為人争议诟病的非”寡婦山基金会”不可了.

不知是当時碍於不能直接拨款予華校,或对反贪法令的顾忌,而最后要以一间私人注册的公司做為一个方便的”吸金工具平台”.也间接造就了私家”吸金工具平台”的同時出现;当时為公為私,各取所需,何乐不為.

在这环境下,华社在不知不觉中,以不情愿的情況下,给某些社会贤达闻人利用過桥,而看似”大众”产业的公司,其实是模凌两可的私人公司. 祇要无大政治变动,或”代理人”沒有遭災劫突变,这样的”模式”也曾受到接受,鼓勵,与全力支持的.

当人民党時代结束后,該基金会也顿然变动而变成私人机构了,华社不能过问其操作状況,甚至需要协助时還要看这位”贤達”的脸色矣. 那种嘴脸和行为举止令人讨厌和不敢恭维了.

这次” 以地养校”政策的建议固然是好事一桩,但前车之鉴,不可贸然无条件盲目支持. 華社必须确保要负責处理” 以地养校”的机构拥有个透明化的行政, 良好监督机制, 与健全合理的投资及发放政策;方能永垂不朽.

华社不能再重犯错误了,也许这就是華社与時并进的一个里程碑?

英文教数理和英语使用的提升

教育部提倡及贯彻以英文教数理提高英语水平,用意无可厚非.

趁学子年幼下手来推行英文教数理則见人见智.有人認為可行,有人則不苟同. 有人則認為是无根據和一厢情愿的做法.有人認為”越帮越忙”而会不必要的增加学子的负担.

有人認為学好英语應循正规教育方式(即增加英文科的节数),效果会更好且评估效果也得当. 譬如,如何知道是英语导致成绩滑落?或祸首是数理科呢?

当今以”顺便兼学英语”有略嫌帶”侥悻”及”拔苗助長”的心态,效果肯定不如專心攻读英文科目来得好.

除了增加英文科的节数外,”制造”和促进英语在校园及校外的广泛使用,將有助於提升英语的进步,水平与接受度. 祇要民间不排斥英语的使用就是成功的一半了.

政府除了在強调英语的实用外,各民族本身的母语,尤其是國语,仍是同样重要和不能妥协的.
政府及民间团体必須表明一致的态度并肯定英语的价值,并認同其提升是有利於國民和國际接轨的重要媒介语.

政府对英语的实际采用与尊敬是英语在我國是否能成功的主要關键.政府的积极态度是不可或缺的主要原素,因此有着深远及很大程度的影响.
為何政府部门不可以先配合教育部而開始領导这个潮流呢?
有了政府部门的注重及開明的使用英语,人民就很快意识到英语的价值性. 那時侯,英语教数理这一論調肯定將沦落為无關重要的话题了.

再問,像这样的民间意愿,政府敢”從善如流”采取这个”改变”的方案吗?